Journals
국내학술지
공동주택 단위주호의 공간구성유형에 따른 정량적 평가지표에 관한 연구
2010.01
|저널명 : KIEAE Journal
|주저자 : 이병호
|교신저자 : 김세용
|공동저자 : 이건원
|Views 20
|2025.12.23
#단위주호
# 공간구성유형
# 통합계획
# 정량적 평가지표
# Residential Unit
# Space Composition Type
# Integrated Planning
# Quantitative Evaluation Indicator
이병호, 이건원 and 여영호. (2010). 공동주택 단위주호의 공간구성유형에 따른 정량적 평가지표에 관한 연구. KIEAE Journal, 10(5), 43-55.
This research investigated 162 residential unit plans which were located in Seoul and Gyonggi Province ranging from 58 to 118㎡ unit net area recently. Through the investigation of unit plans, a matrix was developed based on the 5 criteria for space composition types. 5 criteria are building stock types, W/D ratio of units, unit net area, number of bay to the main orientation, and openness types. After review the matrix, 10 typical unit types were selected. At the same time, quantitative evaluation indicators were developed based on the 4 criteria such as efficiency, openness, flexibility, environmental sustainability. On each criterion, 3 indicators were developed, and measured on 162 residential unit plans.
Firstly, correlation analysis were pursued on 5 criteria for space composition types and 12 quantitative evaluation indicators, and reviewed on each other. Finally, quantitative evaluation indicators of 10 typical unit types were displayed on radar charts in order to show the integrated evaluation on 4 criteria such as efficiency, openness, flexibility, environmental sustainability. From the reviews and radar chart analyses, advantages, disadvantages, and improvements on each typical unit type were presented as research results.
Firstly, correlation analysis were pursued on 5 criteria for space composition types and 12 quantitative evaluation indicators, and reviewed on each other. Finally, quantitative evaluation indicators of 10 typical unit types were displayed on radar charts in order to show the integrated evaluation on 4 criteria such as efficiency, openness, flexibility, environmental sustainability. From the reviews and radar chart analyses, advantages, disadvantages, and improvements on each typical unit type were presented as research results.

